Lee W. Koski v. Standex International Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the pertinent inquiry is whether the decisionmaker, as opposed to other managers or subordinates, evaluated the aggrieved employee based upon discriminatory criteria
• “[A]rguing that Rule 56 … violates the Seventh Amendment … flies in the face of firmly established law.”
• “[A]rguing that Rule 56 … violates the Seventh Amendment … flies in the face of firmly established law.”
• noting that the pertinent inquiry is whether the decision-maker, as opposed to other managers or subordinates, evaluated the aggrieved employee based upon discriminatory criteria
• “[A]rguing that Rule 56 … violates the Seventh Amendment … flies in the face of firmly established law.”
• discussing potential relevance of evidence of a company’s treatment of other older employees in age discrimination lawsuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).