Lee v. Thomason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering evidence that defendant “claimed that he did not remember the collision because he ‘passed out’ approximately ten minutes before it happened and did not regain consciousness until . . . afterward[ ]”
• evidence supporting loss of consortium claim included testimony that husband required help to put his socks on every day, his personality had changed, and he had become forgetful, moody, quiet, sad, and depressed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).