Skip to main content
· 10/28/2002

Lee v. Thermal Engineering Corp.

Citations

  • 572 S.E.2d 298
  • 352 S.C. 81
  • 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The South Carolina General Assembly did not include the definition of ‘wholesale’ or ‘wholesaler’ in this Act, and our research has revealed no South Carolina case law that has defined these terms as they relate to this Act.”
  • “The evidence at trial was that Lee solicited orders of control panels to manufacturers, who in turn used the items to manufacture equipment. Thus, those placing the orders were, for the most part, the ultimate consumer or end user of the products.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cureton, Shuler, Stillwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.