Lee v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because appellant failed to obtain a ruling, her sole enumeration that the court erred in failing to exclude the testimony presents nothing for us to review
• because appellant failed to obtain a ruling, her sole enumeration that the court erred in failing to exclude the testimony presents nothing for us to review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF VALDOSTA & LOWNDES CTY. v. Meeks
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-10-27· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-01-06· cited 16×
• Sillman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-01-24· cited 1×