Lee v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in which this Court implied that the mere presence of a scar resulting from a gunshot wound will not elevate \physical injury\ to \serious physical injury\
• scar from bullet wound not \serious physical injury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte State, 1100640 (Ala. 6-30-2011)
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-06-30· cited 3×
• Vinnie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-05-31
• Terrance Rashuan Moore v. State of Alabama
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-02-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Edwards
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-06-01· cited 75×
• Vo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-09-30· cited 24×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-03-12· cited 17×
• M.T.R. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-01-22· cited 15×
• Cowan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-02-24· cited 12×
• Westbrook v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-08-14· cited 5×