District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/1/2012
Lee v. State
Citations
- 89 So. 3d 290
- 2012 WL 1956416
- 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the present case it is unclear whether or not the trial judge applied the correct standard in denying the motion for new trial. Indeed, the State agrees that because the record on the issue is ambiguous, a new hearing on Mr. Lee’s motion is appropriate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lawson, Monaco, Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.