Skip to main content

Lee v. State

Citations

  • 392 So. 2d 913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court had no jurisdiction to rule on second rule 3.850 motion where an order denying a prior rule 3.850 motion seeking relief on different grounds was on appeal
  • holding that a trial court has no jurisdiction to entertain on the merits a second rule 3.850 motion on different grounds than the prior -postconviction motion, until the pending appeal of the first postconviction motion has been resolved, citing Wells
  • trial court had no jurisdiction to rule on second 3.850 motion where an order denying a prior 3.850 motion seeking relief on different grounds was on appeal
  • trial court had no jurisdiction to rule on second 3.850 motion where an order denying a prior 3.850 motion seeking relief on different grounds was on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.