Lee v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “it seems to be the universal rule that a defendant in a criminal case may waive his right to confrontation *** and that the waiver of this right may be accomplished by the accused’s counsel as a matter of trial tactics or strategy”
• “it seems to be the universal rule that a defendant in a criminal case may waive his right to confrontation *** and that the waiver of this right may be accomplished by the accused’s counsel as a matter of trial tactics or strategy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Buie
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2012-05-24· cited 174×
• People v. Campbell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 106×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-05-27· cited 24×
• Harshaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1982-04-12· cited 15×
• Prunty v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-11-10· cited 12×
• State v. Rivera
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-28· cited 5×
• Ross v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1990-03-07· cited 5×
• Glisson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-06-24· cited 5×
• People v. Clendenin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-18· cited 3×
• Ward v. Union Life Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-07-06· cited 2×
• McKim v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1988-07-13· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Diaz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 1,035×
• Nelson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1974-09-16· cited 47×
• United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby Roberts
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-03-25· cited 40×