Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/19/2015
Lee v. Smith
Citations
- 310 Mich. App. 507
- 871 N.W.2d 873
- 2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that a claim may be considered abandoned when a plaintiff provides no explanation in support of an argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Stephens, Gadola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 557×
- Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 306×
- Holmes v. HolmesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-12-04· cited 127×
- Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court· 2011-08-01· cited 126×
- People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-31· cited 62×
- Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court· 1989-11-08· cited 33×
- Lafarge Midwest, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-10-12· cited 16×
- Aussie v. AussieMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-03-05· cited 9×
- Rowley v. GarvinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-04-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.