Skip to main content
· 8/24/2005

Lee v. PROGRESSIVE EXP. INS. CO.

Citations

  • 909 So. 2d 475
  • 2005 WL 2016904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f proof of the claim would require evidence of the privileged matter, the privileged matter is discoverable.”
  • “[I]f proof of the claim would require evidence of the privileged matter, the privileged matter is discoverable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.