Lee v. Pennsylvania State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying HLA benefits to an off-duty trooper injured while driving to a state police facility to begin his shift
• “[T]he statutory interpretation of the phrase ‘injured in the performance of his . . . duties’ is an issue which is factually sensitive, and, because of that, the principles which we articulate today may not be apposite under other circumstances.”
• “It is obvious that the statutory interpretation of the phrase ‘injured in the performance of his . . . duties’ is an issue which is factually sensitive, and, because of that, the principles which we articulate today may not be apposite under other circumstances.”
• “It is obvious that the statutory interpretation of the phrase ‘injured in the performance of his . . . duties’ is an issue which is factually sensitive, and, because of that, the principles which we articulate today may not be apposite under other circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).