Lee v. Pennington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the two statutes are “very similar in form, language, and legislative intent”
• concluding report of the plaintiffs arrest was neither false nor defamatory
• rejecting arguments that anti-SLAPP statute violated open access to courts, jury trial and due process
• publication of defamatory articles and airing of newscasts regarding police officer’s rape charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).