Lee v. McCue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress because the “plaintiff’s causes of action for battery and false arrest provide[d] a complete source of recovery for his injuries” (footnote omitted)
• false arrest cause of action “provide a complete source of recovery for [plaintiff’s] injuries. Any further claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress would be duplicative”
• “[P]laintiff’s causes of action for battery and false arrest provide a complete source of recovery for his injuries. Any further claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress would be duplicative of these common law claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).