Lee v. Mayor & Council
Citations
- 15 Del. 65
Syllabus
<p>WRIT OF ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW CASTLE CO.</p> <p>Officer. Municipal Corporation. Assumpsit.—The salary or fees of an officer of a municipal corporation may ordinarily be recovered as other debts by an action at law, but such an action cannot be maintained for salary during time not in possession by one claiming the office while there is a de facto incumbent, until the right to the office has been adjudicated in a proper proceeding to try the title.</p> <p>Officers, de jure and de facto.—Whether or not the payment of salary to a de facto officer would operate to exonerate a municipal corporation from payment to the officer de jure, the latter has no right of action for it while out of posses-’ sion of his office, until his title is established by a competent tribunal.</p> <p>Same.—All that is required, when there is an office, to make an officer de facto, is that the individual claiming the office is in possession of it, performing its duties, and claiming to be such officer under color of an election or appointment.</p> <p>Same.—There cannot be two incumbents of an office, and if a de jure officer is ousted and a successor placed in possession, recognized as such officer and performing the duties and drawing the salary without contest or resistance, he is the incumbent de facto, and no one else by mere force of law or right can claim to be such.</p>
Judges: Mabvel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 712×
- People ex rel. Dorsey v. SmythCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-04-15· cited 58×
- Carleton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court· 1862-05-30· cited 46×
- Stadler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court· 1865-05-13· cited 37×
- People ex rel. Lynch v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court· 1841-04-15· cited 32×
- State ex rel. Parker v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1875-10-07· cited 31×
- State ex rel. Glenn v. SteinNebraska Supreme Court· 1882-07-15· cited 28×
- Selby v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1886-12-06· cited 26×
- Carroll v. SiebenthalerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1869-07-01· cited 22×
- Meagher v. County of StoreyNevada Supreme Court· 1869-10-15· cited 18×
- People ex rel. Young v. Trustees of FairburyIllinois Supreme Court· 1869-09-15· cited 18×
- Mann v. MarshNew York Supreme Court· 1861-04-08· cited 16×
- Plumb v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1851-07-15· cited 16×
- McAffee v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court· 1855-04-15· cited 13×
- People ex rel. Perry v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court· 1857-05-18· cited 11×
- Wendel v. DurbinWisconsin Supreme Court· 1870-06-15· cited 11×
- People ex rel. Fiske v. Common CouncilNew York Supreme Court· 1856-09-01· cited 10×
- Bay v. GageNew York Supreme Court· 1862-05-06· cited 10×
- Shaw v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia· 1856-01-15· cited 8×
- Queen v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia· 1877-08-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.