· 6/1/2005
Lee v. Koehler
Citations
- 112 P.3d 477
- 200 Or. App. 85
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering separately whether two arguments in support of a single assignment of error were preserved
- defendant’s complaints during closing argu- ment that attorney’s invoice lacked detail failed to preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence because they were directed to the trial court as factfinder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Deits
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.