Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 6/11/1996

Lee v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 86 F.3d 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that obtaining a “consistent interpretation” of the policy is “in the end what Lapham-Hickey stands for”
  • noting that obtaining a \consistent interpretation\ of the policy is \in the end what Lapham-Hickey stands for\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lee v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.