Lee v. Gober

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fraud laws of each plaintiffs home state should apply
• stating that plaintiffs had bypassed potential opportunities to simplify class and make certification more feasible
• ruling, inter alia, that differences in state consumer-fraud and warranty laws defeated predominance
• employing New Jersey’s choice-of-law principles, which also require balancing of interests, to conclude that warranty laws of each plaintiffs home state should apply
• plaintiff “bears the burden of demonstrating a suitable and realistic plan for trial of the 12 class claims”
• applying law of each plaintiffs home state to breach-of-warranty claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).