Lee v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that section 1983 conspiracy claim against two Rochester Police Department officers was barred under intracorporate conspiracy doctrine
• “[T]he false-arrest and illegal-seizure claims are properly asserted in a single count, inasmuch as they both arise from the same rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.”
• “[T]he false-arrest and illegal-seizure claims are properly asserted in a single count, inasmuch as they both arise from the same rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).