Lee v. Dykes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs testimony of purchase price of diamond ring one and one-half years before conversion did not establish fair market value of ring in absence of evidence of appreciation or depreciation since purchase
• holding plaintiff’s testimony of purchase price of diamond ring one and one-half years before conversion did not establish fair market value of ring in absence of evidence of appreciation or depreciation since purchase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).