Skip to main content
· 8/28/2009

Lee v. City of South Charleston

Citations

  • 668 F. Supp. 2d 763
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77230
  • 2009 WL 2824776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the public strip search which exposed arrestee’s genitals, but only to the arresting officer was not legally outrageous
  • disallowing outrage claim based on a roadside public strip search that exposed arrestee’s genitals to the arresting officer
  • noting evidence of disparate treatment by state police throughout state, county, and city but no evidence of disparate treatment by municipal officers employed by the particular city
  • noting evidence of disparate treatment by state police throughout state, county, and city but no evidence of disparate treatment by municipal officers employed by the particular city

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Copenhaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.