· 8/28/2009
Lee v. City of South Charleston
Citations
- 668 F. Supp. 2d 763
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77230
- 2009 WL 2824776
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the public strip search which exposed arrestee’s genitals, but only to the arresting officer was not legally outrageous
- disallowing outrage claim based on a roadside public strip search that exposed arrestee’s genitals to the arresting officer
- noting evidence of disparate treatment by state police throughout state, county, and city but no evidence of disparate treatment by municipal officers employed by the particular city
- noting evidence of disparate treatment by state police throughout state, county, and city but no evidence of disparate treatment by municipal officers employed by the particular city
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Copenhaver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.