Lee v. City of Norfolk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting building owner’s argument that he had been denied due process because the letter he received from the city, which advised him his building would be demolished, cited a nonexistent section in the building code and gave him a shortened time period to appeal
• “The law is well settled that the abatement of a nuisance by a public body is not a compensable taking.”
• “It is possible for a state agency to fail to adhere strictly to its regulations without violating the constitutional right to due process.”
• plaintiff in procedural due process claim must be deprived of constitutionally protected interest in life, liberty, or property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).