Lee v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that weak evidence of defendant’s involvement in drug scams was admissible to show mutual trust among co-conspirators, and that challenges to strength of the evidence went to weight, not admissibility
• finding no prejudice where “plenty of evidence in the record echoed” conclusion of inadmissible evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).