Lee v. Arnsdorff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary judgment for the defendant was warranted because there was no triable issue of fact on reasonable reliance
• holding that reliance on alleged misrepresentations was unreasonable as a matter of law
• knowledge of the allegedly breached fiduciary duties cannot be inferred from knowledge of primary tortfeasor’s employment
• “First, we set aside the contention that issues of ... reasonable reliance are not subject to summary disposition.”
• knowledge of a business relationship did not establish that the defendant “knew his dealings ... violated any agreements ot his fiduciary duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).