Lee v. Appraiser Certification & Licensure Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• chal- lenged finding was not critical to the board’s decision, thus, even if the finding were erroneous, it did not provide a basis for reversal
• unchallenged administrative findings are binding on judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Powell v. Bunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-11· cited 27×
• Gildroy v. Board of Tax Service Examiners
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 2×
• Tandem Properties, LLC v. Construction Contractors Board
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-02· cited 1×
• Mata v. Dept. of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 57×
• Pacific Motor Trucking Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-08-24· cited 7×
• Ulrich v. Senior & Disabled Services Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-24· cited 3×