Lee, R. v. PBPP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• filing a lawsuit to collect debts that are outside the applicable statute of limitations violates the FDCPA
• “When Oregon courts interpret statutes, they apply a newly announced interpretation of a statute retrospectively to the dispute that prompted it.”
• “The FDCPA makes debt 26 collectors strictly liable for misleading and unfair debt collection practices.”
• “The FDCPA makes debt 24 collectors strictly liable for misleading and unfair debt collection practices.”
• “When Oregon courts interpret statutes, they apply a newly announced interpretation of a statute retrospectively to the dispute that prompted it.”
• “FDCPA makes 24 debt collectors strictly liable for misleading and unfair debt collection practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).