LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM v. G E I C O GENERAL INSURANCE CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that rental distinctions revealed in disclosure requirements imposed by rent stabilization ordinance “easily . . . survive[d] rational basis review”
• holding that 2 disclosure requirements imposed by rent stabilization ordinance did “not work any type of per se taking, for example by a physical invasion or by depriving the property owner of all beneficial use of the property”
• noting that procedural and substantive due process 6 claims “both require, as a threshold matter, that plaintiffs show they were deprived of a 7 ‘constitutionally protected life, liberty or property interest’” (quoting Shanks v. Dressel, 8 540 F.3d 1082, 1087 (9th Cir. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).