Lee Kwong Nom v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[b]road allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by 21 specific examples or articulated reasoning, do not satisfy the Rule 26(c) test.” (internal quotations 22 omitted) (quoting Cipollone v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 785 F.2d 1108, 1121 (3d Cir. 1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).