Skip to main content
· 2/2/2015

Lee Graham Shopping Center v. Estate of Diane Z. Kirsch

Citations

  • 777 F.3d 678
  • 2015 WL 409643
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding federal court had jurisdiction to decide contract interpretation issue though it could affect the state court's distribution of estate assets
  • holding federal court had jurisdiction to decide contract interpretation issue though it could affect the state court's distribution of estate assets
  • probate exception not applicable, even though court's disposition \may affect future distributions\ by a probate court
  • probate exception not applicable, even though court’s disposition “may affect future distributions” by a probate court
  • after Marshall, a matter “does not fall under the probate exception if it merely impacts a state court’s performance of one of [the] tasks” Marshall reserved to the probate court
  • after Marshall, a matter \does not fall under the probate exception if it merely impacts a state court's performance of one of [the] tasks\ Marshall reserved to the probate court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Shedd, Thacker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.