· 2/2/2015
Lee Graham Shopping Center v. Estate of Diane Z. Kirsch
Citations
- 777 F.3d 678
- 2015 WL 409643
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1610
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding federal court had jurisdiction to decide contract interpretation issue though it could affect the state court's distribution of estate assets
- holding federal court had jurisdiction to decide contract interpretation issue though it could affect the state court's distribution of estate assets
- probate exception not applicable, even though court's disposition \may affect future distributions\ by a probate court
- probate exception not applicable, even though court’s disposition “may affect future distributions” by a probate court
- after Marshall, a matter “does not fall under the probate exception if it merely impacts a state court’s performance of one of [the] tasks” Marshall reserved to the probate court
- after Marshall, a matter \does not fall under the probate exception if it merely impacts a state court's performance of one of [the] tasks\ Marshall reserved to the probate court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkinson, Shedd, Thacker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.