Lee County v. Abrahams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FASA barred a protest because an agency’s challenged action was the “direct and immediate cause” of the issued task order
• declining jurisdiction over decision to partially re-compete issued task orders, noting “[particularly telling [was] the relief sought”
• denying protest where the issuance of a task order was the “but for” cause of the protest
• finding the task order bar applied to the challenged corrective action
• “[T]he Army’s corrective action was its decision to compete a new task order under the IDIQ [Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity] contract.”
• “[T]he Army’s corrective action is ... intimately entwined with the issuance of the two initial task orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).