Skip to main content
· 9/8/1982

Lee C. Martin v. Dennis M. Luther, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, Respondents

Citations

  • 689 F.2d 109
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaching conclusion about parole rev- ocation “supported by common sense and an assessment of the practical consequences, which naturally guide our inter- pretation of legislative enactments”
  • reaching conclusion about parole rev- ocation “supported by common sense and an assessment of the practical consequences, which naturally guide our inter- pretation of legislative enactments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Eschbach, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.