Skip to main content
· 4/26/2004

Lee Brenneman v. Medcentral Health System

Citations

  • 366 F.3d 412
  • 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 769
  • 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1007
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8132
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,643
  • 2004 WL 904114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs excessive absenteeism rendered him unqualified for his job as a matter of law
  • holding that plaintiff’s later deposition testimony that the doctor prescribed medication was insufficient to provide notice of “a regimen of continuing treatment”
  • concluding that the medical leave a pharmacy technician requested as an accommodation for his disability was not reasonable because his absence “placed a great strain on the Pharmacy Department”
  • concluding that the medical leave a pharmacy technician requested as an accommodation for his disability was not reasonable because his absence “placed a great strain on the Pharmacy Department”
  • concluding that regular attendance was an essential function based on a supervisor’s affidavit that the “plaintiffs excessive absences placed a great strain” on the workplace because other employees would have to fill in for the plaintiff, decreasing morale
  • concluding that an employee who was terminated because of excessive absences that were unrelated to diabetes was not qualified, and would not be qualified due to these absences even if her accommodation request for medical leave were granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Rogers, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.