· 9/14/1994
Lee Argabright Norma J. Argabright v. United States
Citations
- 35 F.3d 472
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 12988
- 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 764
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7083
- 74 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6350
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25133
- 1994 WL 498215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to review an interest abatement claim, but exercising subject matter jurisdiction over that claim
- declining to review an interest abatement claim, but exercising subject matter jurisdiction over that claim
- applying Torres to dismiss appeals of appellants not named or implicitly indicated through the use of “et al.” or “plaintiffs” in the notice of appeal
- applying Torres to dismiss appeals of appellants not named or implicitly indicated through the use of “et al.” or “plaintiffs” in the notice of appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Noonan, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.