Skip to main content
· 9/14/1994

Lee Argabright Norma J. Argabright v. United States

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 472
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 12988
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 764
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7083
  • 74 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6350
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25133
  • 1994 WL 498215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review an interest abatement claim, but exercising subject matter jurisdiction over that claim
  • declining to review an interest abatement claim, but exercising subject matter jurisdiction over that claim
  • applying Torres to dismiss appeals of appellants not named or implicitly indicated through the use of “et al.” or “plaintiffs” in the notice of appeal
  • applying Torres to dismiss appeals of appellants not named or implicitly indicated through the use of “et al.” or “plaintiffs” in the notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Noonan, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.