· 11/15/1868
Ledoux v. Jones
Citations
- 20 La. 539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding jurisdictional bar “when the plaintiff filed a charge with the appropriate agency but did not provide notice of the particular claim later pursued in court”
- denying exhaustion of a disability discrimination claim where that box was left unchecked, and the details section of the Charge failed to provide any information that could be read to “express or even hint” at plaintiff’s disability claim
- Plaintiff’s request for “light-duty” as disability accommodation qualified as protected activity for Rehabilitation Act retaliation claim
- EEO documents are “judicially noticeable public records”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wydy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.