Ledford v. Sears (In re Williams)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where a debtor voluntarily and without pressure sharply increased its monthly payments for goods bought on credit, the payments were not in the ordinary course of dealings between the parties
• Ledford v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tidwell v. Atlanta Gas Light Co. (In Re Georgia Steel, Inc.)
  M.D. Georgia· 1984-03-21· cited 62×
• In Re Rustia
  S.D. New York· 1982-05-18· cited 47×
• Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ken Gardner Ford Sales, Inc. (In Re Ken Gardner Ford Sales, Inc.)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1981-04-14· cited 36×
• Production Steel, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp. of America (In Re Production Steel, Inc.)
  M.D. Tennessee· 1985-10-23· cited 34×
• Butz v. Champaign Landmark, Inc. (In Re Bodey)
  S.D. Ohio· 1983-10-13· cited 3×
• Matter of Williams
  S.D. Ohio· 1980-08-26· cited 2×