Ledford v. Moskowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiffs expert was board certified in defendant’s specialty and that the expert “kept up with literature” related to that specialty
• holding that a doctor who did not have knowledge of a community’s “specific medical statistics” still met the locality rule because he testified that he worked in rural communities in Georgia that resembled those he would testify about in Tennessee
• finding that a neurologist was competent to testify as to the standard of care for a psychiatrist, where the neurologist was also certified and trained in psychiatry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).