Skip to main content
· 2/3/1988

Ledford v. Martin

Citations

  • 321 N.C. 473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • specifying that an injured party in a breach of contract case is bound to mitigate loss and damages are not recoverable as far as damages are compounded because of failure to act
  • recovery of profits lost on unplanted crops disallowed because plaintiff, “with trifling inconvenience,” could have bypassed defendant’s nuisance and planted crops

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.