Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that OAR 436-060-0020(4) (2016) by its terms, addresses processing obligations at the time of claim closure and not whether authorization has been provided on an open claim
• courts defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of its own rules, but no such deference is owed to an agency’s interpretation of another agency’s rules
• authorization of temp dis- ability benefits may be inferred from a medical record rea- sonably understood to show the doctor’s approval excusing the worker from work
• although evidence showed that the worker had become medically stationary, as of the date of the hearing, the claim remained open; thus, the medically stationary date on the open claim had not yet been determined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).