Skip to main content

Ledbetter v. State

Citations

  • 49 S.W.3d 588
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 3903
  • 2001 WL 661242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that prosecutor told witness several weeks before trial that his testimony was necessary and that subpoena was served on witness more than three weeks before trial
  • stating the trial court held the forfeiture hearing after the witness did not appear at the courthouse on the date for which he was subpoenaed
  • stating a writ of attachment would have been clearly futile because the State did not know the witness planned to leave the county and did not know where to locate the witness
  • rejecting assertion that writ of attachment is necessary, stating “State is not required to engage in clearly futile activities before a trial court can, in its discretion, determine that the State made good-faith efforts to produce a witness at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd, Reavis, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.