Skip to main content
· 12/24/1998

LeCroy v. Dugger

Citations

  • 727 So. 2d 236
  • 1998 WL 892604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the summary denial of a postconviction motion because the defense alleged no facts to substantiate its conclusory claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
  • “[S]peculation and conjecture about what . . . letters and notes and opinions and cryptic references may suggest is not sufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing, much less relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.