LeChase Data/Telecom Services v. Goebert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court below had “determined that [plaintiff] failed to establish [defendant’s] actual knowledge; and that [defendant] was therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law,” but reversing on ground that plaintiff had shown such knowledge
• “Section 77 authorizes a trust beneficiary to recover trust assets from anyone to whom they have been diverted with notice of their trust status.”
• “[T]he primary purpose of article 3-A and its predecessors is to ensure that those who have directly expended labor and materials to improve real property or a public improvement at the direction of the owner or a general contractor receive payment for the work actually performed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).