Lecatt v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding plaintiffs $1,104,227,348 in damages as restitution for the bonus payments made for the breached leases
• “In the absence of a contrary statute, a challenge to administrative discretion can only be reviewed in district court pursuant to the APA.”
• “In the absence of a contrary statute, a challenge to administrative discretion can only be reviewed in district court pursuant to the APA.”
• “In the absence of a contrary statute, a challenge to administrative discretion can only be reviewed in district court pursuant to the APA.”
• In Insurance Co. of the West, the court “reasoned that the rights of Tucker Act claimants are subject to the common law principle that an assignment transfers an assignor’s rights to its assignees, including the right to pursue the rights of its insured against the government”
• order for Rule 54(b) Judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).