Skip to main content
· 5/24/1996

LEC Capital Corp. v. Dilley

Citations

  • 919 P.2d 458
  • 67 O.B.A.J. 2180
  • 1996 OK CIV APP 64
  • 1996 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 50
  • 1996 WL 366633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the court held that LEC Capital Corporation was not a party “interested” in the probate proceeding, and thus lacked standing to prosecute a petition
  • wherein the court held that LEC Capital Corporation was not a party “interested” in the probate proceeding, and thus lacked standing to prosecute a petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett, Jones, Joplin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.