Lebovits v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re Lebovits)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, without discussion of the statutory language, debtor’s $60.00 per month tithing was covered by and within the 15 percent permissible threshold of RLCDPA
• stating that debtor “is currently commanding the highest salary that he can expect to earn” and that debtor “has no expectations of pay raises other than cost-of-living adjustments”
• stating that debtor “is currently commanding the highest salary that he can expect to earn” and that debtor “has no expectations of pay raises other than cost-of-living adjustments”
• “It is reasonable to infer that the Debtor’s expenses attributable to his children will likely extend or even increase for a significant portion of the repayment period.”
• monthly tithes of $100 were reasonable for purposes of § 523(a)(8)
• 7 children; $4,700 monthly income; $40,000 in student loans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).