Lebleu v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting appellant‘s contention that ―he constantly makes threats, but because he never intends to carry them out, his conviction is not sound‖
• Evidence sufficient for conviction of retaliation where appellant did not 23 make off-hand, one-time statements in anger immediately following a ruling, but made several statements over a period of time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).