Texas Supreme Court· 7/12/1989
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc
Citations
- 778 S.W.2d 865
- 32 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 577
- 1989 Tex. LEXIS 90
- 1989 WL 123440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that if a party is represented at trial by counsel, there is no default judgment even if the party does not personally appear
- stating that there was no default even though husband failed to appear personally for trial because he was represented at trial by counsel
- The Craddock factors apply to all default judgments, those “entered on [the] failure of a defendant to file an answer and those entered on failure to appear for trial.” (citing Ivy v. Carrell, 407 S.W.2d 212, 213 (Tex. 1966))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vannerson v. VannersonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-06-03· cited 214×
- Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court· 2009-11-12· cited 162×
- Velasco v. AyalaTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-11-19· cited 47×
- in the Interest of M.V.G., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2010-03-03· cited 41×
- Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa· 2012-11-02· cited 34×
- In the Interest of K.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-07-10· cited 25×
- Hatzlachh Supply, Inc. v. Moishe's Electronics Inc.S.D. New York· 1994-03-07· cited 15×
- In the Interest of C.G.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2008-08-19· cited 5×
- In Re KCTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-07-10· cited 1×
- In Re CgTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2008-08-19
- Deborah Joyce Jackson v. Phil Jackson, Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-02
- Betsabe Ivonne Niessen Velasco v. Alfonso Ignacio AyalaTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-11-19
- in the Interest of J.J., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-03-06
- in the Interest of K.C., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-07-10
- in the Interest of K.A.C.O & J.C.C.OTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-03-03
- C. B. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective ServicesTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-04-11
- in the Interest of M.D.W., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-06-27
- in the Interest of C.M.D. and H.M.A. A/K/A H.M.A., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-11-29
- Todd Simmons v. Mitel Leasing, Inc. F/K/A Inter-Tel, Leasing, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-10-10
- Lori Rosenstein v. Howard RosensteinTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-11
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.