Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Insurance Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[O]ne of the basic functions of a trademark is to advertise the product or services of the registrant.\ (emphasis in original)
• “[I]t is settled that a potential for coverage cannot be based on an unresolved legal dispute concerning policy interpretation which is ultimately resolved in favor of the insurer.”
• “[I]t is settled that a potential for coverage cannot be based on an unresolved legal dispute concerning policy interpretation which is ultimately resolved in favor of the insurer.”
• “[I]t is settled that a potential for coverage cannot be based on an unresolved legal dispute concerning policy interpretation which is ultimately resolved in favor of the insurer.”
• “[I]t is settled that a potential STREET SURFING V. GREAT AM. E&S INS. CO. 9 for coverage cannot be based on an unresolved legal dispute concerning policy interpretation which is ultimately resolved in favor of the insurer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).