Leavitt v. SW & B Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury could reasonably infer decisionmaker knowledge of an employee’s disability based on evidence that the decisionmaker “conferred with individuals who did know about [the employee’s] disability before the final decision to terminate was made”
• granting summary judgment for defendant on associational discrimination claim that did not resemble any of the examples provided in the EEOC interpretive guidelines
• “If filing a workers’ compensation claim is not ADA protected activity, it is not ADA protected activity to testify to support a claim.”
• same for the ADA and title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).