Leavitt v. Mizner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding, as matter of law, that attorney's alleged negligence could not have caused harm
• summary judgment record showed that any negligence of criminal defense counsel did not harm former client plaintiff
• summary judgment record showed that any negligence of criminal defense counsel did not harm former client plaintiff
• \Evidence is considered 'newly discovered' in this context only if it was 'unknown and unavailable at the time of trial despite the diligence of the moving party' \
• explaining standard for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).