Skip to main content
· 9/3/1901

Leavenworth v. Billings

Citations

  • 26 Wash. 1
  • 66 P. 107
  • 1901 Wash. LEXIS 597

Syllabus

<p>NEW TRIAL — EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPLICATION-REPEAL BY IMPLICATION.</p> <p>Laws 1897, p. 13, which requires a motion for a new trial to be filed within two days after verdict rendered does not repeal by implication, so far as motions for new trial are concerned, Laws 1893, p. 414, § 24, which provides that “the court may enlarge or extend the time, for good cause shown, within which, by statute, any act is to be done, proceeding had or taken, notice of paper filed or served, or may, on such terms as are just, permit the same to he done or supplied after the time therefor has expired,” and consequently the action of the court on the day following the rendition of a verdict, in granting an extension of twelve days’ time in which to file a motion for a new trial, was not erroneous.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.