· 11/14/1988
Leatherwood v. Meisch
Citations
- 297 Ark. 91
- 759 S.W.2d 559
- 1988 Ark. LEXIS 475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s grant of motion to dismiss based upon condition of bond agreement attached to 4 The sole motion to dismiss case upon which she relies is clearly distinguishable from the facts presently before us. See Renton, 319 Ga. App. at 903- 904 (3
- “If there is any discrepancy between 6 the allegations in the complaint and the attached exhibits, the latter control.”
- “If there is any discrepancy between the allegations in the complaint and the attached exhibits, the latter control.”
- a copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes, and thus, in ruling on a motion to dismiss, a trial court is authorized to consider exhibits attached to and incorporated into the complaint
- “‘A copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes.’ OCGA § 9-11-10 (c). Thus, in ruling on a motion to dismiss, a trial court is authorized to consider exhibits attached to and incorporated into the complaint.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holt, Newbern, Purtle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.